Kaufhold & Dix Patent Law
Protect Your Intellectual Property — Call Kaufhold & Dix at
612-216-1161
For A Free Consultation

Could USPTO leniency be the open door for patent trolls?

Just about anything seems to hold some potential for becoming weaponized these days. Cyber bullying uses social media to inflict shame and pain on others. Flaming arrows over Twitter have seen a resurgence of life lately, especially in politics. In the intellectual property world, many agree that the threat comes from patent trolls.

Unless you live under a rock (or perhaps a bridge), you know that patent trolls are individuals or entities who leverage patents in a legal way. As one recent study describes them, patent trolls obtain rights to patents from others who did the actual work. The attractive patents are those that offer an opportunity for asserting rights against alleged violators, usually in hopes of scoring financial settlements.

The fact that these enterprises don't seek to create useful products but only capitalize on patents makes them suspect in the eyes of many. But the report by researchers from Harvard and the London School of Economics suggests that the weakest link in what should be a strong IP protection chain might be patent examiners who fail to vet patent applications properly before granting approvals.

As the report notes, examiners play an important role in the patent process. They don't just say yea or nay on patents. They have the power to ask for refinements of claims to be sure they really apply to the invention in question. Some examiners do this more often than others, however, and the presumption is that more is better.

The researchers looked at the work of various examiners recently. They found that a disproportionate number of approved patents sparking lawsuits by enforcement entities were those for which the fewest changes in claims were sought. Specifically, they determined that approvals that reflected one standard deviation in greater leniency than average resulted in a significantly greater chance of patent litigation – by 64 percent.

Those experienced in representing patent seekers will likely agree that approval of broadly worded claims is desirable because it affords more enforcement potential for the holder. The economists therefore recommend that for patents to have true value, examiners need better training to challenge claims and have more time to render decisions.

On the other hand, applicants might be justified in arguing the process is already too complicated and takes too long to complete. What do you think?

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
Don't risk losing your intellectual property rights by failing to act.

Register for patent, trademark or copyright protection by calling Kaufhold & Dix at 612-216-1161.

Contact An IP Attorney Today

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

Email Us For A Response

Edina Office
7400 Metro Blvd, Suite 420
Edina, MN 55439

Phone: 612-216-1161
Edina Law Office Map

Sioux Falls Office
6330 S. Western Ave, Suite 100
Sioux Falls, SD 57108

Phone: 605-334-1571
Fax: 605-334-1574
Sioux Falls Law Office Map